When
I worked at one of my former employers, which I’ll call ESPA (standing for
Employment Service Provider A) whenever
the marketing team sourced an employer vacancy that we were unable to fill
quickly from within our large caseload of approximately one thousand registered
unemployed jobseekers, rather than lose the new or pre-existing employer
relationship to another employment service provider who may have a suitable
client on their caseloads – for which there were many providers in the area
with the same contract as our own – my former employer, ESPA, did what none of
the other providers did. They still attempted to fill these vacancies even
though they may not receive any payment.
Now,
for anyone unfamiliar with how employment services works, the provider earns
money from the government in a number of ways: pre-placement servicing of
clients, placing clients into employment either brokered or un-brokered, and follow
on payments when the client successfully reaches two key retention milestones
if the client works at or above required participation levels.
In
other words, providers receive commission for training and assistance provided
throughout the clients participation in the service program, and then rewards
the provider for placement and post placement conditions and milestones being
met.
Chances
were ESPA reasoned: if there was a suitable client that was not on our caseload
then there was a perfectly reasonable chance that a suitable candidate was sitting
on one of the other providers’ caseloads.
So,
rather than turn the employer or vacancy away, or worse, let one of our
competitors snap up our hard-won employer so they could fill the vacancy and claim the fees, ESPA adopted the
unique practice (well, I think it is unique seeing as none of the other
companies I have since worked for have done the same practice) of still attempting
to fill the employer vacancy – despite no guarantee of any payment for doing so
– with externally sourced applicants.
Don’t
be fooled into thinking, wow, what a caring company. ESPA were still business all the way. They
didn’t do any of this coming from their heart, they remainder purely dollar
driven.
ESPA
advertised the vacancy on the free government job board, with the purpose of
soliciting interested unemployed
candidates registered with other agencies; who could potentially be enticed to
transfer to our services rather than stay with our competitors under the lure
of near guaranteed employment. With this job carrot dangling in front of many long-term
unemployed people desperate to get off welfare payments and end their
employment service attendance, only a signature on a transfer form was all that
was needed to entice many into sealing the win-win-win for ESPA’s stats, the
employer and the client. It also inadvertently made ESPA look fantastic in the
eyes of the governing department, when our stats demonstrated how quickly we were
able to place some of our clients!
To
give you an indication of how successful ESPA was, we had one large office fax
machine dedicated solely to the task of receiving faxed applications for each
of the ten to fifteen sourced vacancies per week we couldn’t immediately fill.
My
role in ESPA was as frontline receptionist and amongst many other things one of
my (minor) tasks entailed removing the never-not-printing machine of the two-
to three- hundred applications that were pumped out each day to match the
applications to the vacancies. On the application end date, I was required to
hand to my Site Manager ‘absolutely no more than three resumes and accompanying
cover letters for each vacancy’.
Yes,
you read that right. No more than three
names (and documents) for each vacancy. Only one, if I could effect it.
When
my manager first told me this would be one of my duties, I admit, in my
nervousness to make a good impression I nearly had a panic attack!
How
could I, with no previous experience in this industry, possibly sift through so
many job applications to come up with only three or less applications to hand
to her? Was this lady nuts? Did she have
any idea how hard it would be to
filter two- to three- hundred applications down by this much? I mean, I knew
she was a very busy person and all, and didn’t have time to waste on going
through the applications her own self, but, this was excessive. Was she so far
out of reach in her management job that she had no idea the difficulties she
was dumping upon me on my very first day?
She
must have had an inkling of what was going through my mind, because she patted
me on the shoulder with a smirk on her face, and before she left me to it, told
me she had full confidence that I would get it right: “You are a smart
woman. You had an unusually good resume,
I’m sure you will have no trouble culling the piles down to hand me only the
ones worth me taking a look at. You already know what a good one looks like.”
To
tell you the truth, bolstered by her vote of confidence and the state of the
very first cover letter, I suddenly realised just how unproblematic this task would be for me, after all. My Manager was
right. I would have no trouble with the culling process. Not while I mimicked an Acquisition Editor
culling a Slush pile. Jobseekers, the
applications coming through, like amateur writers with their manuscripts, made this task absolutely cinch easy-peasy.
Now,
I had long been interested in becoming a published author one day, even if I
didn’t have any completed works to submit.
Over the course of my informal study I had learned about Slush Piles,
and Acquisition Editors who discarded and rejected significantly more
manuscripts as unsuitable after reading merely the first chapter, because they
could tell so much more about the manuscript and writer from this little slice
of reading enough to know far more than what was on the page.
The
same became true in my resume sifting duties: I immediately became a sort of
Vacancy Acquisitions Editor, only my slush pile wasn’t novel manuscripts, it
was resumes with cover letters.
For
each position, I quickly looked up to determine what the basic needs of the employer were, and then I scanned each of the
cover letters accompanying resumes underneath.
Almost all of applications
that I pulled from the catch tray I immediately determine ‘I wouldn’t hire this
person’ and so I heartlessly tossed the application and resume immediately into
the Secure Disposal bin positioned next to the bulky laser fax-printer –
without even flipping past the cover sheet (in most cases) to look at the
resume, and without guilt, because I was too busy in this very demanding role
to stop to think about two to three hundred people sitting at home hoping that
their phone will ring sometime within the next week after having sent that fax
off.
But
mostly I didn’t feel any guilt because of one simple fact: the applicant had already
failed to make a good impression. It was not my job to make a good impression.
My job was to decide which applications made the first round cut and which ones
didn’t, and hand only the best applications to my manager for her to assess their
merits at the next level. And if those
applications had failed to impress me, they would most definitely have failed
to impress my hard-to-please Manager.
I
didn’t need to come up with reasons to justify my placing resumes in the
rejection bin, the jobseekers themselves bombarded me with every reason
imaginable for me to easily just make the decision to reject it.
All
I wanted to know, in my bottom of the hiring process role, was ‘does this
applicant have a forklift licence, and does he have any experience’ for the Forklift
Driver vacancy I was culling for, or perhaps ‘has she worked with MYOB’ for a bookkeeping
one. I didn’t have time to shift through
reams of terrible handwriting, or read about how candidates saw our ad and
think they will be interested in working for the company (which by the way, we
didn’t identify within our listing, so was just cliché phrases being bandied
about).
I
wanted to know – and too many applications didn’t tell me – what the applicant’s
name was, did the person have any experience as a forklift driver, did they already
possess the required licence, and was the person available to start when our
employer wanted them to start.
When
our employer told us ‘they must be available to work weekends’ we listed this
in our position vacant listing. So, why dear applicants, would you write within
your cover letters ‘I’m looking for day work only’ and thus ensure your
elimination from consideration at such an early round? Did you even read the ad?
The
trouble is, now that I am three and half years or so experienced in this
industry since that early position, that too many jobseekers only care about
their own needs and wants, and go looking for employers who will give them what
they want. But employers only care about
their own needs and wants, and if the
candidates currently submitting applications aren’t prepared to meet these essential
and desirable requirements, then they will just keep looking until they find
someone who will. And the jobseeker
remains on the caseload building up resentment that no employer will give them
a fair chance.
Sorry,
but reality check: you did have a fair chance.
A position that you were interested in came up and you blew it because
you fail to see past your own needs and wants; you failed because you weren’t
flexible and therefore made a bad
impression, so you were (rightfully) dropped out at this early stage of the
culling process.
I
got very excited whenever I was able
to hand my Manager even one or two applications to review for any of the vacancies. My manager never questioned ‘why’ on the regular
occasions when I didn’t hand her any applications for some very popular
vacancies. Actually, she praised me. I
soon learned that we would just run the listing on the job board for another
week, and get another batch of applications to keep the fax-printer being the
highest working member of our medium sized team for me to play acquisition
editor of the job searching world.
My
time at ESPA taught me that every
step of the job application process is about making a good impression. It also taught me that too many people are
completely clueless to how to achieve this though.
In
upcoming posts, I will discuss how you can get the edge over pretty much 99% of
the competition by continuously leaving a good impression at every stage of the
hiring process. And. how if you get something wrong in the application process
the mistake generally causes someone like me to drop you, heartlessly, out of contention.
Do
your applications make a good impression?
No comments:
Post a Comment